Comic Book News & Reviews – Be Heard @ Comic Nerd
After months (hell, even years) of hype and anticipation, The Dark Knight finally hit theaters the 18th! The sequel to Batman Begins, also directed by the brilliant Christopher Nolan—who reinvigorated Bat-films and changed the respectability of comic book movies for the better—The Dark Knight showcases a cast of highly talented actors like Christian Bale as Batman/Bruce Wayne, Gary Oldman as Lieutenant Jim Gordon, Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent/Two-Face, Michael Caine as Alfred Pennyworth, Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox, Maggie Gyllenhaal as (the new) Rachel Dawes—and the celebrated late Heath Ledger as the Joker.

On opening day, The Dark Knight hit number four in top pre-sale releases of all time according to MovieTickets.com. ComicNerd writers Stephanie, Redhollywood, and Clayton were there Friday, so grab onto something and read their reviews of this summer hit movie (which has been selling out like crazy) after the jump.
And here we … go!

As much as I’d love to go all out and give an in-depth review of this film, I need to see it at least one more time to do that, because it’s just so complex. I think it can be argued that one of The Dark Knight’s greatest achievements is its greatest downfall—for one-time moviegoers, that is. This movie has so many layers, and is so philosophical on top of all the action and everything else going on, that when you combine it with its two-and-a-half hour length, it’s hard to wrap your head around fully the first time. Don’t get me wrong: it’s all handled remarkably well. But I’ve read several reviews now in which people have said, “Whoa, what a film! How great is it? I think I need to watch this at least one more time first before I say anything extreme.” It’s not that people aren’t smart enough to gauge the depth of this movie—it’s just that The Dark Knight is one of those films that just keeps revealing more of its secrets the second, and even third, time around. More pieces fall into place, subtle threads take on bigger meanings.
Anyway, besides … for those of you who haven’t seen it yet, I’m keeping this basically spoiler-free.
Let’s put a smile on that face, because The Dark Knight, folks, rocked my socks clean off. In that theater Friday, I was Like a Dog Chasing Cars—it was that good. Okay, okay, enough of the cheap soundtrack jokes. Jeez. You’re probably thinking, “And I Thought My Jokes Were Bad.” (All right, last one, I promise. ;D )
But hey, while we’re already on the subject, let’s start with the soundtrack. It was great! It was reminiscent of the Batman Begins score, but in a whole new way that fit the tone of this movie. In fact, everything about this movie was great. The story was awesome. It was laid out brilliantly, and even though so much happened—with pure action followed by more beautifully crafted action—it wasn’t confusing or overwhelming. The movie truly did feel realistic, in everything from the action sequences to the Joker’s schemes that threw everything into chaos—into anarchy. And man, was it one hell of a Joker story. The Joker really did show us (and Gotham) a better class of criminal.

Heath Ledger makes this movie golden. There wasn’t a scene that he was in—let alone a moment—that wasn’t just awe-inspiring to watch. Every second he’s on screen he makes unique, whether it’s an expression or a gesture or just the way he delivers his dialogue. The Joker’s voice may have taken Heath the longest to nail, but he nailed it, all right. Dead on. He was horrifying one moment in his chaos, and the next he was making you laugh—guiltily, I might add—at his sick but hilarious jokes. Like the magic trick? That rocked.
The Joker’s role in this movie, and everything he says, strikes deep. It gives the movie so many layers of depth. And I’m not just talking about the fan nods that were thrown nicely into the mix, making it even more enjoyable (aka many things were reminiscent of comics like The Killing Joke, Year One, etc.). The Joker—and also his interaction with the Batman and his effect on him—leaves a powerful mark. What he says and what he does raises a lot of ethical questions, and you have to admit he makes good points (not only in his humor, either). “When the chips are down, these civilized people will eat each other.” And they almost do, Joker. Almost. In that way, it’s very reminiscent of The Killing Joke. In fact, one of the things I love most about Nolan’s Bat-films is that they draw so heavily but gracefully from the comics themselves, striking hard into the heart of Batman and all of the other characters (including the Joker). Christopher Nolan lays everything out swiftly and with ingenius precision.
Even though the Joker essentially is this movie, that doesn’t mean that the other characters aren’t balanced in a meticulous way. This film is, after all, a Batman film. Batman’s voice is a lot deeper in this one, which was cool; he’s a lot darker. Bruce Wayne, on the other hand, is as innocently clueless with his boyish charm as ever (and we get a fun, quick moment between Bruce and Gordon, yay!). I loved the redesign of the Batsuit—and I can’t even begin to tell you how freaking awesome the Batpod is. And while Batman Begins had Bats just starting out, and left him to the shadows, TDK shows him in a more comfortable stage: meaning we get to see him kick butt on screen, not just in the conceal of darkness. And it makes for some spectacular visuals, all around (not just with Bats).
(And you know, when I saw the one tv spot with the bat lenses, I was worried that that was going to be downright cheesy. But it actually wasn’t in the movie. It worked. And the sonar thing was downright awesome.)

Maggie Gyllenhaal gave Rachel Dawes even more spunk, passion, and fire—and made her way more courageous than even Katie Holmes’s Rachel was. Kudos.
Now, as fans of comic book movies, we’re all too familiar with what usually happens as a result of more than one villain in a flick. Either one doesn’t get enough screen time, or it just ends up a mess. So I’m going to say this. You know how in comics—especially Batman comics—the villains and/or criminals are always working together or interacting in some fashion? It works here, folks. It feels like a classic Batman comic book come to life—in a really good way, of course. The way Two-Face and the Joker interact is genius. It was simply handled really well. It’s balanced in TDK.
And speaking of Two-Face, Aaron Eckhart is charming, moral, and honorable as Harvey Dent and horrifyingly powerful as Two-Face. What a brilliant transformation. Eckhart did this really well and smoothly. Lucius Fox was even more fun and had a bigger role than he did in Begins. And Alfred was as sarcastic and sweet as ever. And in the penthouse, after you-know-what happened and Alfred was consoling Bruce … it was very reminiscent of that scene Batman Begins when Alfred comforts young Bruce after his parents’ death—both in dialogue, emotion, and set-up. Well done, Nolan. That was smart. What is more, one of the deepest moments in this film comes from the story Alfred tells Bruce. And when Bruce finally asks how they caught the bandit, Alfred answers, “We burned down the entire forest.” How’s that for a parallel? Bats might not realize it now, but to stop the Joker permanently, he would have to do just that. The two would destroy Gotham trying to kill each other. But instead, Batman is “incorruptible,” as the Joker himself puts it. He won’t break his one rule. And thus, the legend of these two began … Even the Joker senses that at the end, telling Batman he has a feeling they’ll be doing this a loooong time.

On a separate note, Gary Oldman as Jim Gordon was amazing. That man was born to play Gordon. He has the looks, and he has the heart of Gordon down perfectly. So I’m really glad that he got a MUCH bigger role in the sequel.
The film itself shows us a better class of comic book movie. It met my expectations and then some. I want to see it again. And again. This movie might be two-and-a-half hours, but everything deserves to be there; it ends really well, setting up a lot for another movie. I loved Nolan’s “not a hero” take, too—because it’s true. Batman’s not a hero. He’s not doing it for the glorification that comes with the connotation of a hero. Like Gordon said, he’s Gotham’s silent guardian, their Dark Knight. He’s wearing a mask, unlike Harvey Dent, Gotham City’s White Knight. He does what he has to do, but he indeed does it outside the law. He’s a good guy, but not a pure hero (and certainly not a traditional one)—not like Harvey Dent was before he was scarred; not like Gordon is. And just having that theme running through the movie, it really emphasizes the tragedy of what happens to Harvey.
On a lighter note, GOD was this movie fun. Everything was brilliant: the humor, the characters, the story, the action, the directing, the visuals … And yes, my friends. Heath Ledger’s Joker was classic. Timeless. Period. The Best. Jack Nicholson, eat your heart out.
And Nolan … you better give us one more, or we’re gonna Introduce a Little Anarchy. ;D
* * *
Bam! Biff! Kapow!!! All of us who are Batman lovers recognize these sounds and thankfully they were not present in the new movie The Dark Knight. In the movie Harvey Dent says, “The night is always darkest before the dawn.” Well fair readers, celebrate and rejoice for the dawn of comic book movies has finally come.
The Dark Knight surpasses the title of comic book movie and has broken into the realm of real crime drama thriller. The movie was near 3 hours long but in my mind it wasn’t long enough. There was no filler in this movie. Everything was there for a reason and it was all done great. Most people will be talking about Heath Ledger’s performance as the Joker, but I want to praise Nolan and his compatriots for the story of The Dark Knight. It was a beautifully crafted story of love, choices, and sacrifices. The dialogue was written well and the action scenes were scripted perfectly. The only thing I had a problem with was when his motorcycle did the 180 on the wall. That was a little bit corny.

All the actors shined in this movie. I, for one, thought Maggie Gyllenhaal was a better Rachel Dawes and Aaron Eckhart was an amazing Harvey Dent. He was very believable. Of course, the man with the most amazing performance was Heath Ledger. The Joker was sinister, funny, and psychotic. Ledger portrayed a man who thrives chaos. His performance was flawless. He showed how smart the Joker is from always being one step ahead of everyone to being ruthless and maniacal. My favorite aspect of his performance was his tick. The way he would lick with his tongue was genuinely creepy.
This movie earns the title of Best Comic Book Movie in my opinion. Some people will disagree with me on this point, saying that Iron Man was the better of the two. Don’t get me wrong, Iron Man was a great flick, but as far as storyline, acting, and writing are concerned, The Dark Knight takes the cake.
There is one thing that I was pleased with the most in The Dark Knight and that was lack of easter eggs. I was so glad that DC did not put in a bunch of easter eggs for the fanboys to salivate over. I am glad there were no cameos by Adam West or anyone else. This is something that Marvel needs to take note of. Sure easter eggs are fun, but for comic book movies to be taken seriously they need to be written seriously, and The Dark Knight did just that. This movie is a must-see and then a repeat must-see. I give it Best Movie of the Summer.

* * *
WHAM! POW! SMACK! These words were once the thing people thought about when the heard the name Batman. Adam West, shark repellent purple gas, and colorful costumes filled this campier than camp show and sadly became the example for our hero.
As years would pass, Tim Burton stepped up to helm the first Batman film. Things started well, as two entertaining, albeit over-the-top, films were made. However, the franchise soon fell back into depravity with further incarnations bringing the silliness and even more colorful costumes from West’s show.
Fortunately, dear readers, these days have passed.
I’ll be the first to admit that I didn’t really care for Batman Begins. Too much action and kung-fu for my purist stomach to digest I suppose. Don’t get me wrong, it was a good movie. It just didn’t feel like Batman. So, despite a brilliant marketing campaign and fantastic trailers and clips, I didn’t expect greatness. I was wrong.

The Dark Knight is the most serious superhero film ever made. Period. It takes what many view as simplistic and childishness genre and completely turns it on its ear. It’s dark, brooding, and more complex than many critics have given it credit (despite their rave reviews). In fact, the whole movie feels real. It’s as close as what we could imagine to seeing if there actually was a painted madman terrorizing Chicago and a winged protector defending it.
I hate to say it, but it makes Marvel’s Iron Man looks like a cartoon by comparison. This is coming from someone who has entertained the idea of an Avengers or Captain America shield tattoo. Yeah. I know. I said entertained, I haven’t actually done it.
Folks, we need more movies like this. We need films that make comic books look serious. For far too long graphic novels and comics have not been viewed in a serious light. Maybe a few more films might change that. Perhaps.

Let me get back on subject here. The Dark Knight is the best big budget film to come out this year. It is the most serious and thought-provoking comic adaptation ever put on the big screen. It is, my fellow nerds, as good as it gets.
Your turn: So? What did you think of The Dark Knight? Did it meet your expectations (and then some), or do you think the hype was too high? Let us know!
// Remember! You do not have to register in order to post comments!
Pop culture news and comic book reviews of the latest issues released weekly by YOU! Simply comment and let the world know what you think about what you read or watch!
Dark Knight, but bright box office weekend « What Is Techno Again?
July 21st, 2008 at 6:33 pm
[...] Watched: The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan [...]
Stephanie
July 21st, 2008 at 10:02 pm
Red and Clayton, you both bring up great points—and I love that our reviews compliment each others’!
(It’s funny you both started your reviews out in a similar fashion, btw. Haha!)
Red: Yeah, I liked that there were no silly easter eggs. And I feel the same way about Iron Man vs TDK: for me, TDK wins. Maybe it’s because I’m such a big Batman fan—and they’re both great films, like you said, yeah—but TDK just has so much more to offer, I think. Still, Iron Man was a ton of fun—but that’s where the difference is. Iron Man is light-hearted, Batman is dark …
(But haha, I actually liked when Bats did the 180 turn with his Batpod. Although I see what you mean. I was just drooling over the Batpod the whole time. Especially when he comes out of the alley while riding it and comes to a quick stop … that was awesome. I’m not sure exactly what was spinning (the lights?) on the Batpod, but it rocked. Ha! And flipping the truck … hell yeah!)
Clayton: Well said, man. Like I said in my review, as well—soo many layers, soo well done.
And yes, I agree: it did feel real. Watching this, you actually forget it’s a comic book movie. It’s so non-traditional—in a very GOOD way.
michael
July 22nd, 2008 at 1:37 pm
All of you did a wonderful job on these! You all make excellent points.
Stephanie: You’re totally spot on, the Joker stole the show. He made this movie what it is. As for your aside to Red, I “think” the whole bat pod was rolling in that scene, like the wheels extend so the rider is safe in that instance, but I can’t be sure.
Red: See, I like the silly Easter Eggs, I like to see Stan Lee in Marvel movies, I like to see Lou Ferrigno as a security guard and Bill Bixby on the background on tv. I love all those things, those little hidden nods to the comic geeks in the audience. I like belonging to that secret club. And yes, I am one of those people that disagree with you, I found Iron Man to be the superior movie, although it has been pointed out to me that this is because it was a little more “fun” and less dramatic. And hey, I’m a Marvle guy, I think I may be biased.
Clayton: Yes, very well said, It was very realistic, or as realistic as something like this could be. A wonderful job was done attempting to rationalize the gadgets and everything Batman did.
Excellent movie, excellent reviews! I applaud you 3.
redhollywood
July 22nd, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Thanks Michael I am a huge Marvel fan as well but for Marvel’s movies to as good as TDK has been it has to be accessible to everyone and that was what this movie was. You didn’t have to know a lot of background to understand what was going on. I loved Iron man. I thought it was a fantastic movie. I will admit that Iron Man can’t be made the same way TDK was because the subject matter is a little more over the top. Either way these were both great acheievments for comic book movies.
New Comics for 07/23/08 + Tuesday Wrap-Up by ComicNerd: Comic Book Reviews
July 22nd, 2008 at 3:04 pm
[...] once and even if not, it looks like people are enjoying it. Well, ComicNerd has an exclusive HUGE review of The Dark Knight up right now. GO READ IT RIGHT [...]
Stephanie
July 22nd, 2008 at 5:43 pm
Mike: Thanks! =) I had fun reading Red’s and Clayton’s reviews—I’m glad we all brought up different points, but also similar points in different ways.
And yeah, it’s hard to tell about the Batpod, heh.
Mike and Red: About the easter eggs. I think both of you are right, actually. Mike, easter eggs are fun. They work in fun, more light-hearted comic book movies like Iron Man or the new Incredible Hulk one. And they are cool. But I think Red is also right. Firstly, TDK is a darker movie, so it just wouldn’t make sense to put a silly easter egg in. It just doesn’t fit, anyway, even if they wanted to (and honestly I don’t think they even thought about that). But TDK is at the height of the genre (and really it doesn’t feel like it even belongs in the genre—it’s that good), so it’s a good thing that there are no easter eggs and that it really screams, “Hey. Yeah, Batman’s based on a comic book. But you’re going to forget it. You can take comic books seriously, folks.”
So TDK is a good example, like Red is pointing out with the easter egg thing. But I think both of you are right, in a way. After all, who doesn’t like a fun comic book, too? But for Batman, that just doesn’t make sense. I mean, the ’60s tv show was campy—and that’s just NOT Batman at all. And it gave a lot of people the wrong idea.
Red: Yeah, I got that sense, too. I mean, was it just me or did TDK feel … really separate from Batman Begins? Especially since there was a “new” Rachel Dawes. It just felt completely … different. I mean, there’s Gotham, too. BB and TDK are very different films—but they feel totally separate, in a way, as well. I like that. And it definitely works with the sense that yeah, time has indeed passed since BB.
Martin
July 22nd, 2008 at 6:56 pm
I watched the thursday in the opening day here in Argentina. After reading the reviews, I feel I missed a lot of details, I need to watch it again.
Everybody is claming for a third Nolan Batman movie. Do you think it will be as good as Batman Begins and The Dark Knight?
Clayton520
July 22nd, 2008 at 7:44 pm
Godfather 3, Spider-Man 3, Star Wars VI, X-Men 3, Priates 3…
So, I seriously doubt a 3rd would be worth anything. I mean, I would love to be proven wrong, but it’s just a cinematic facts that very very few trilogys are worht anything.
Stephanie
July 23rd, 2008 at 12:09 am
Ouch, you do have a point there, Clayton. And it’s going to be extremely hard to top TDK. And although I have a worried feeling about a third movie—I want one. And I’m also optimistic, because Christopher Nolan, his brother, and David Goyer (credit is due where credit is due—the writing was fleshed out by those two, as well) have done something extraordinary. Nolan’s Bat-films are different, and Christopher Nolan is extremely competent. So thinking about that, I feel a little at ease.
So yes, I want a third movie. Hell yes!
Break the downward spiral of a trend, Nolan. Make your third film amazing. You’ve revolutionized the Batman movie franchise and comic book movies forever—now give us another magic trick. ;D
redhollywood
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:12 am
actually Nolan hasn’t even confirmed that he would do the third movie..as a matter of fact he said he thinks he doesn’t want to do one.
Michael
July 24th, 2008 at 10:41 am
Ok, first things first, Red, I totally agree with you that TDK was a different type of movie, and I absolutely loved it for all of those reasons. I also thing Iron Man was an excellent movie and loved it for a different set of reasons. I guess deep down inside and if pressed under torture I would have to say that I loved them equally, however, letting my bias shine, Iron Man was more fun for me and that leads to my enjoying it more, but it’s like saying I enjoy calzone more than pizza, same thing different format.
Steph, yes, the tv show was campy as hell, fun for me as a kid because I was a kid and fun now because it’s so over the top it’s hillarious. However, I think some nods could have been made to Batman’s past in different mediums. “Easter eggs” or just acknowledging the fans can be handled tastefully, mentions of other characters, places in the universe like Metropolis, other heroes even. I don’t think it took anything away from the film NOT having them, but I don’t think it would ruin the film to add them either.
Clayton, Ok for the most part on you sequel bashing was accurate, I only have one comment, Star Wars, Return of the Jedi(VI) was an excelllent movie. Not the strongest of the initial series, but much better than episodes 1-3. Also, while X3 was not as good as X2, I didn’t think it was a week film.
I can see them not wanting to explore a 3rd film, after all, the Joker can NOT be played by anyone else with the efficacy that Ledger played him. However I would love to see Nolan put forth the effort, maybe with an appearance by one of my favorite Bat villains, the Riddler! They could have like, Jim Carrey play him or something….I’m totally kidding. But please GOD, No Robin, No corny jokes, No Val Kilmer!!
Stephanie
July 24th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Red: Heh, I actually read the opposite of that—but it wasn’t Nolan doing the talking, it was one of the other writers. He said something about Nolan saying he needed a long vacation now, and to the writer, that was a pretty good sign that he is going to do a third film. I guess if anyone would know it would be the other writers. And one of them said (ack, I wish I could remember whether it was Jonah or David Goyer) that he knew the theme of the final film and the villain—but of course, no loose lips.
Mike: Yeah, true—if they were done tastefully, like you said. Because otherwise it just would NOT work. But at any rate, I’m glad they just left the easter egg thing alone for this movie. I’m perfectly content with leaving them out when it comes to this—especially because, well, what characters could they reference? Batman’s only … Batman at the moment. No Batgirl, or Robin, or anyone right now. Sure, they could have made a joke hinting at something—and that actually might have worked perfectly fine. But I think something like that would have worked a lot better, and fit better, in Batman Begins—TDK is a LOT darker, so I’m glad they left it out. Not that there wasn’t fun humor in TDK—there was. But at any rate, I like it how they did it.
But no Metropolis. Clooney Batman, anyone? “This is why Superman works alone”? What?! Ugh. ;;smacks head on desk;; No thank you.
(So no heroes … I really don’t think any others exist in the setting of the Nolan Bat-films, anyway. It would just seem … out of place. It’s kind of in a bubble superhero-wise—which suits me just fine. This is a Batman movie, not a Justice League one.)
And yes, there wasn’t anything wrong with Return of the Jedi that I remember. I love SW; even though I’d probably have to watch the original trilogy (the only SW films that really matter, in my opinion) again to make an assessment of which one was the strongest and which one I liked best (although a lot of people agree that the second was indeed the best, and yeah, I think I probably liked that one the most, too—probably) … the last film was still great.
But X3 … ugh. X3’s only achievement was its special effects: they were gorgeous, making a lot of scenes phenomenal. But that was all. There was no well-thought out plot, and it was just a mess with so many characters. It was not handled well at all—why did Singer leave us?
I think I’ve said this before (somewhere), but honestly, I don’t think the Joker is a big deal when it comes to the third film—not as much as an obstacle as people are making it out to be. They can reference the Joker without having to show him. They can just say he’s in Arkham, or he escaped and he’s planning something somewhere—whatever. They don’t have to recast, and they don’t have to make the third film about him. There are TONS of other villains in Batman’s Rogues’ Gallery. Choose someone else for the third film—someone fresh. Not saying that it was a mistake to choose the Joker, who’s been done before—no way in hell was that a mistake. I’m glad they did. It was mind-blowing. But just … end the last Nolan film with a fresh face. Please? And I think the screen writers will acknowledge that and do their best … So fingers crossed.
As far as Robin goes, I feel the exact opposite: I think it’s the perfect next step, and here’s why: Batman Begins was very Year One, TDK was very Long Halloween—so logically, the third film should be very Dark Victory. Year One had Batman’s origin; so did BB. TDK had the Harvey-Batman-Gordon relationship going on, with Harvey’s turn into Two-Face—just like TDK—and it takes place after Year One. Dark Victory, which follows TLH, didn’t even INCLUDE Robin until the near end. DV has Batman in a very dark place (with losing Harvey, etc.)—just like Batman is left at the end of TDK: He lost Rachel AND Harvey, so he’s more alone than ever; Gotham is hunting him, and the Joker has emerged. That’s a very dark place to be in. DV is soo much like that. There is so much they could do if they used that as a basis. And Robin only came in at the end, like I said—lifting Batman out of that darkness. He needs Robin; whether you like Robin or not, you can’t deny how important he is to the Batman mythos. Not just tradition-wise, either—he’s essential in Bruce/Batman’s life.
They didn’t rush Robin into the tights and mask in DV—so there’s no reason to do that at all in the last Nolan Bat-film. Besides, it would end on a hopeful note of closure, and be a mark that the mythos lives on—the future awaits.
I think if anyone can do Robin—or any Batman character—realistically and in a cool, believable, and respectful way, it’s the competent Mr. Christopher Nolan.
ComicNerd reviews: 7-21-08 « What Is Techno Again?
July 27th, 2008 at 11:55 am
[...] Watched: The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan [...]
graphicArtist
August 4th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
I could see Robin in the third film. A circus co-owned/sponsored by Wayne Enterprises gets sabotaged by the mob for non-payment resulting in the deaths of all but the youngest Flying Grayson, Richard “the Robin”; who is already a teen.
By this time, Wayne Manor has been re-built and Bruce takes him in and coaches the bitter young man who eventually puts 2 and 2 together and asks to join Batman in fighting crime. Bruce tells him “no”.
While researching the gang that killed the Graysons, Batman meets their hired muscle, Killer Croc, who puts up one helluva fight. Robin tails Batman, though, and helps save Batman.
Bruce reconsiders and lets him join but Robin is dealing with his temper and attempts to kill Croc, breaking the ‘one rule’. Eventually, Croc and the gang are put down, Batman and Robin split up and Richard Grayson appears at the end as NightWing.
What?!? It could happen.
Nitpickers, gather ye ’round « What Is Techno Again?
August 5th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
[...] notes and deliver my verdict afterwards (with a full throttle review, by the way, that expands on this). I’m not sure whether I like it better (deeper = good?) or worse than, say, Batman’s [...]
Dark Knight, White Knight, and the King of Anarchy « What Is Techno Again?
August 11th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
[...] can read the short version of my review on ComicNerd.com, by the [...]